<$BlogRSDURL$>

"It is true, and thus the question of whether it is sad or happy has no meaning whatever."
Bernhard Schlink



Science is best when discussed: leave your thoughts and ideas in the comments!!



Thursday, February 14, 2008

Eat More Bears 



I found this on the Emory campus. I'm fairly certain that its creators - as far as I can tell the pep squad for the undergraduate womens' basketball team, i.e., 19-year-old girls - have no idea the wider implications of this slogan.

Lucky for them, bears do not generally take much interest in young girls.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Monday, October 15, 2007

Legally Blonde: The Musical 

I have to admit, I have a slight weakness for musical theater. When I was a kid my parents insisted that we see all the classics, if only because they deemed contemporary entertainment 'inappropriate.' We should've been playing outside anyways.

It's midterms, and last night I was looking for any excuse to not study or write papers for a while. Surfing through the channels, I noticed that MTV was playing something that was almost music: the Legally Blonde musical. That's right, a Broadway show, beamed straight (well, maybe bi?) to my living room. Sadly, I was nothing but disappointed.

For all the accolades, I found the music insipid at best, unlistenable at worst, and tired either way. The entire cast of presumably talented people all sounded like they were talking in rhythm, never actually singing but occasionally belting. Way more than in a normal musical. Also, why does Elle sound like she's from the Midwest?

What really annoyed me the most though was the bizarre plot rearrangements. Why did we need to see Warner and Vivian's engagement right in Elle's face, as opposed to it having happened over the summer? Why was there so much extra filler dialogue? And, most infuriatingly, why did the entire point of the film (which should have been insufferable, but turned out sweet and a bit inspiring) get swept away? Why does musical-Elle need Emmett there the whole time to push her to succeed and hold her hand and tell her what to do, instead of movie-Elle who got pissed off and did it all on her own? Ditzy language aside, movie-Elle was really a feminist model. Musical-Elle is anything but.

All in all, I don't know what the big deal is, except for audiences gobbling up whatever test-marketed pap served to them, just like always. Seriously. This show looks and sounds like something cooked up by the same folks who gave us Haley Duff and the Cheetah Girls (minus Raven Simone).

----------------
Now playing: Prototypes - Who's gonna sing
via FoxyTunes

Labels: , , , , , , ,


Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Preferences 



I mean, there are exceptions, I'm sure, but yeah. Pretty much.

Labels: , , , , ,


Tuesday, April 10, 2007

What Butt? 

Via the always-entertaining Jessica Cutler:

Also, I would really like to thank a visitor from Austria for informing me that this blog is currently the number one Google result for "sperm good for hair"...Awesome.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,


Thursday, December 14, 2006

Boyfriend Material 

As I am too fried from the tail end of finals (p = .857143, if you're interested) to really think clearly, and am looking for any excuse to giggle, Dan Renzi has made a list of his Rules for how well-meaning stright friends should go about setting their gay friends up together.

My take:

1. Definitely critical.

2. +/- 5 years for me, if only because more than that might make it a crime for him to buy me a drink!

3. "Being gay" is not 'something we have in common.' It is something that is true about both of us, but not something worth talking about.

4. Agreed.

5. I'd drop the "slightly" and "recipe for drama."

6. Quite.

7. Yes, but do make sure I know I need to be presentable...don't invite me out to play beer pong and then say to my ratty-t-shirted and probably not-on-anything-approaching-my-best-behavior self "oh, you should meet ..."

8. Yup.

Labels: , , , ,


This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?